And I read where both Rwy 1L and 1R which are normally used for takeoffs are closed for maintenance.

(Written on 06/09/2023)(Permalink)

This device is not a Class 2 low-power laser pointer. It's a Class 3 dangerous laser device due to its power output in a visible wavelength. Only Class 4 infrared lasers are more dangerous as they are invisible. This is a dangerous situation at night and could blind both pilots even if only temporary.

(Written on 04/14/2023)(Permalink)

I also loved C9, was a UAL brat as Dad worked SFO ramp for 43 years. Remember one July monsoon approach to DEN from PHX where our flight was the last to land due to the approaching thunderstorm. As we approached the gate, a HUGE lightening shot nearby sent everyone scurrying in for about a half-hour ground stop. We shut down engines short of the gate but the jokes on C9 from the pilots were worth the delay!

(Written on 03/18/2023)(Permalink)

Vlad was trying to overspeed the TPE331-10GD powerplant on the MQ-9 by dumping fuel in the engine inlet--this bypasses the normal overspeed protection of a flyweight valve in the fuel control. My money sez' that prop left a big hole in Vlad's jet and shook some teeth when it hit. Definitely unprofessional flying.

(Written on 03/18/2023)(Permalink)

This a a good argument for allowing public caning. Probably not a laser pointer though, it's likely a Class 3 (dangerous) laser commonly used for outdoor light shows.

(Written on 12/17/2021)(Permalink)

From the original article-- "As concerns about sustainability and the environment mount — the World Wildlife Fund describes air travel as “the most carbon intensive activity an individual can make” — discussions around aviation are increasingly focused on how new tech and ideas could cut its environmental footprint." When did the WWF become an expert on aviation emissions? Didn't United recently fly what was reported as "the first 100% biofuel-powered flight"? But it really wasn't 100% biofuel powered, one engine operated on biofuel (at about $40/gallon) while the other burned kerosene Jet A (about $3/gallon). Again, we see that when it comes to "climate" we don't get the whole picture from the climate nazis and their media lapdogs. We are deceiving ourselves to think human activity affects global climate and that we should kill our economies to fix it--the climate predictive models are fraudulent. There is no doubt global warming is occurring (which may actually be a goo

(Written on 12/17/2021)(Permalink)

The additional virtue is it probably costs 15X compared to kerosene. And you won't be able to transport in a pipeline.

(Written on 03/20/2021)(Permalink)

Looks like the hollow fan blade in these 112 inch fans needs a life limit. Fan blades are critical parts that are supposed to meet fail-safe design criteria. Read about the 2018 failure on N773UA and the OEM inspections performed on these blades. UAL is probably relieved that these blades were inspected by PWC.

(Written on 02/27/2021)(Permalink)

Thanks for correction. Expect an AD to add the disagree indjcator.

(Written on 03/22/2019)(Permalink)

I read where there is an option to have dual AOA sensors, which are on most of the US fleet and would identify a failed sensor. Both accident aircraft only had one AOA sensor. Pilot training is an obvious issue as well as it is reported the Lion Air jet had an identical incident the day before where a jumpseat pilot instructed the crew how to disconnect so some pilots do know how to respond. Also read that engineers within FAA certification were concerned that the aerodynamics of the MAX-8 were sufficiently different to warrant a new type certificate instead of adding it to the existing TC. The ODA process is also going to come under scrutiny here.

(Written on 03/22/2019)(Permalink)