Thou shalt not inquire.

(Written on 10/01/2022)(Permalink)

Yes, it is not within the reasonable realm of possibilities to question if an inoculated individual experienced a serious adverse event caused by any of the safe and effective covid vaxxines. Yes, I am “hopelessly stupid” for even raising such a question. I dutifully await the “careful medical and forensics investigations.” Thank you for setting me straight.

(Written on 10/01/2022)(Permalink)

Who said (or even implied) it is “about politics”? Adverse-event deniers are not confined to any particular political persuasion.

(Written on 10/01/2022)(Permalink)

Could be rapid progression of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma following his booster??? SEE: https://www.NCBI.nlm.nih.GOV/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8656165/. Regardless, let us hope that the NTSB thoroughly investigates the deceased pilot’s toes for stubbing and whether he ate Del Taco or Taco Bell.

(Written on 10/01/2022)(Permalink)

No -- my sincere apology for apparently being unclear. I am questioning the possibility that the pilot could have had an adverse reaction (in this case, ultimately, death) to a covid vax (not to covid itself).

(Written on 07/01/2022)(Permalink)

It would be nice to have more info, such as when/if the pilot (RIP) had his booster jab. An honest autopsy is probably in order (I won't hold my breath).

(Written on 07/01/2022)(Permalink)

It doesn't seem worthwhile on net to continue to hash this out (you certainly have given me a lot I would have to take on), but I appreciate your reply (sorry for my delay). Though I try to be generally well informed, I did not know about the Bioshield Act, so thanks for that. I do not appreciate you impugning my motives and veracity -- I care very much about truth and good governance (both are endangered species, if not unicorns), and no agenda would ever make me intentionally misrepresent anything. I want a better world, including for tyrannized airline pilots.

(Written on 07/01/2022)(Permalink)

I'm trying to figure out how what you wrote (to which I am directly replying) could be truthful. Your comments were the first two -- by hours -- at this Squawk. I was here and saw with my own eyes. Your comment preceded "the earlier post about 'no Fly or safety related duties.'" As I type here and now, your comment says it was posted "about a day ago"; the comment that you claim to be responding to was posted "about 12 hours ago." I always try to be truthful, so, speaking for myself, I have "no worries."

(Written on 30/12/2021)(Permalink)

Did you read the document? One is relegated to a non-pilot/non-flying status for the 48 hours (not just a PIC restriction). Several alternative duty options are suggested. If I misunderstood you, it was an innocent error.

(Written on 30/12/2021)(Permalink)

Per the CDC, on a page last updated Dec. 17, 2021: “COMINARTY products are not orderable at this time. … Pfizer has provided the following statement regarding the COMINARTY branded NDCs and labels: ‘Pfizer received FDA BLA license on 8/23/2021 for its COVID-19 vaccine for use in individuals 16 and older (COMIRNATY). At that time, the FDA published a BLA package insert that included the approved new COVID-19 vaccine tradename COMIRNATY and listed 2 new NDCs (0069-1000-03, 0069-1000-02) and images of labels with the new tradename. At present, Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these new NDCs and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution. As such, the CDC, AMA, and drug compendia may not publish these new codes until Pfizer has determined when the product will be produced with the BLA labels.’” I repeat the words of the CDC itself: COMIRNATY PRODUCTS ARE NOT ORDERABLE AT THIS TIME. A

(Written on 30/12/2021)(Permalink)