I wonder if this new seating contributed to the decision to retire the 747 early. No need to design this seating for the slightly wider 747, just the 767, 777, 787, and A350. But, sounds like it might be a while before it hits the 787-800s. Storage space is a plus, while the folks in the back could keep a laptop under the seat in front of them, only first had any storage during takeoff and landing. It does look like they will get fewer seats, as when the seat is on the left, the aisle space is not used other than to avoid stranding passengers. This will result in fewer "free" upgrades by platinum and 1K being available and potentially higher revenue.

(Written on 04/06/2016)(Permalink)

Excessive limiting is likely to be a non-issue, as over-regulation is considered to be a "taking", for which compensation is due. Where it gets interesting is when new runways are a possibility but not yet approved, and permits are not given. This is the kind of case which will go to the Supreme Court. Regulations imposed for safety purposes are acceptable without it being considered a "taking", but the safety concerns are likely to be judged by a court.

(Written on 03/07/2014)(Permalink)

The Forbes article on which the CNET article is based (and references), has more detailed information. The cobalt oxide chemistry was also the same chemistry used in the Dell laptops which experienced a few battery fires. I also wonder if the Boeing batteries are kept sufficiently cool when the plane sits empty on a hot summer day in the sun, then brought over and used. The Boeing battery fires all happened during the northern hemisphere's winter, which makes it all the more puzzling. Neither of the professors ideas sound quick to implement - active battery cooling or switching battery technology, then manufacturing and getting the replacement certified. The original battery technology underwent more than 1 million hours of testing during the certification process.

(Written on 28/01/2013)(Permalink)