Back to Squawk list
  • 1

F-35 tests fell short, Pentagon report says

נשלח לפני
 
[...]the DOT&E found the trials, "did not -- and could not —demonstrate that Block 2B F-35B is operationally effective or suitable for use in any type of limited combat operation, or that it was ready for real-world operational deployments, given the way the event was structured," the report says. (www.cnn.com) עוד...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


preacher1
preacher1 5
Somebody is lying. The F35 is and always will be a hunk of very expensive junk.
madison41
Ray Dahl 2
$159m per copy...will likely need design changes...engine reliability issues...first flight 2006 STOP THE MADNESS!
bbabis
bbabis 1
For a negative headline that sure was a positive story. I guess if you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullsh!t. Oh! for the days of Kelly Johnson, who just made things work. The F-35 suffers from being designed by CEOs and politicians that do what sounds good instead of what works.
yr2012
matt jensen 0
Fatal flaws within the cockpit of the US military’s most expensive fighter jet ever are causing further problems with the Pentagon’s dubious F-35 program.

Just weeks after a fleet of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighters was grounded for reasons unrelated, a new report from the Pentagon warns that any pilot that boards the pricey aircraft places himself in danger without even going into combat.

In a leaked memo from the Defense Department’s director of the Operational Test and Evaluation Directorate to the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Pentagon official prefaces a report on the F-35 by cautioning that even training missions cannot be safely performed on board the aircraft at this time.

“The training management system lags in development compared to the rest of the Integrated Training Center and does not yet have all planned functionality,” the report reads in part.

In other sections of the lengthy DoD analysis, Operational Test and Evaluation Directorate Director J. Michael Gilmore outlines a number of flaws that jeopardize the safety of any pilot that enters the aircraft.

“The out-of-cockpit visibility in the F-35A is less than other Air Force fighter aircraft,” one excerpt reads.

Elsewhere, Gilmore includes quotes from pilots commenting after test missions onboard the aircraft: “The head rest is too large and will impede aft [rear] visibility and survivability during surface and air engagements,” said one. “Aft visibility will get the pilot gunned [down] every time” in dogfights, remarked another.

“Aft visibility could turn out to be a significant problem for all F-35 pilots in the future,” the Pentagon admits.

http://www.rt.com/usa/pentagon-f35-report-combat-012/
preacher1
preacher1 1
Ain't supposed to be no more dogfights, remember, it's a stand off fighter. Wasn't supposed to be anymore in Vietnam either so they built the F$ at first with no guns, but somebody forgot to tell those Mig's.
preacher1
preacher1 1
yr2012
matt jensen 1
Several initial pilots were ejected thru canopy just sitting on end of runway during testing 1959-1965. Canopy closed - None survived.
preacher1
preacher1 1
I heard about that but we didn't have instantaneous news back then that let us hear about every flat tire, like now.

כניסה לאתר

עדיין אין לך חשבון? הירשם כעת (ללא תשלום) כדי ליהנות מתכונות מותאמות-אישית, מהתראות טיסה ועוד!
האם ידעת שמעקב הטיסות של FlightAware נתמך על ידי פרסום?
תוכל לעזור לנו לוודא ש-FlightAware יישאר חינמי בכך שתאשר קבלת מודעות מ-flightaware.com. אנו מתאמצים מאוד להקפיד על כך שהמודעות שלנו יהיו רלוונטיות ולא מטרידות כדי ליצור עבורך חוויית משתמש מעולה. מהיר וקל לכלול את המודעות של FlightAware ברשימה הלבנה ואפשר גם לשקול את האפשרות ליצור חשבונות פרמיום.
סגור